Multiple Choice Identify the choice that
best completes the statement or answers the question.
|
|
|
The Philadelphia convention was supposed to start on May 14, 1787, but few of the delegates
had actually arrived in Philadelphia by that date. The convention formally opened in the East Room of
the Pennsylvania State House (later named Independence Hall) on May 25. Fifty-five of the
seventy-four delegates had arrived. Only Rhode Island, where feelings were strong against creating a
more powerful central government, did not send any delegates.
Who Were the
Delegates? The fifty-five delegates were relatively young. James Madison was thirty-six,
Alexander Hamilton was thirty-two, and Jonathan Dayton of New Jersey was twenty-six. Thirty-three of
the delegates were members of the legal profession. Half of them were college graduates in a country
in which less than 1 percent of the population finished college. Seven were former chief executives
of their states; eight were important businessmen; six were large-plantation owners; and three were
physicians.
Several men stood out as leaders. George Washington, who had served as commander
in chief during the Revolutionary War, was already a national hero. Among all the prominent men
assembled at the Philadelphia convention, Washington was immediately recognized as a leader. Benjamin
Franklin was a world-famous scientist and diplomat. At eighty-one years old, he played an active role
in the debates (even though he had to be carried in on a portable chair held by four prisoners from
the local jail). Virginia had sent James Madison, a brilliant supporter of a strong central
government. Madison's carefully taken notes are our primary source of information about what
happened at the Constitutional Convention. He is often called the "Father of the
Constitution" because he authored the basic plan of government that was ultimately adopted.
Thomas Jefferson, unfortunately, could not be at the convention because he was serving as ambassador
to France. John Adams could not attend either, as he was serving as ambassador to Great
Britain. | |
|
|
1.
|
What is the author trying to communicate about the constitutional convention in
Philadelphia.
a. | that the delegates were knowledgeable, experienced cross section of citizens
| c. | that only 1 percent of the delegates were college graduates | b. | that the delegations
were too young | d. | that there
was a great deal of disunity among the delegates |
|
|
2.
|
Who was considered the “father of the constitution?”
a. | Thomas Jefferson | c. | James Madison | b. | George Washington | d. | Benjamin
Franklin |
|
|
3.
|
Which state refused to participate in the convention?
a. | Virginia | c. | Pennsylvania | b. | New York | d. | Rhode Island |
|
|
|
Working Conditions The delegates worked for 116 days and actually met on 89. In
their meeting room, the windows were usually shut. None of the delegates wanted anyone to hear what
they were doing. They did not want rumors spread about the form of government on which they would
ultimately decide. Besides, if they opened the windows, hordes of flies would descend upon them. The
air became humid and hot by noon of each day. At the end of each session, they retired to a nearby
tavern, the Indian Queen.
George Washington was chosen to preside over the meetings. Each
state had one vote on all questions, and a simple majority rule was used. Delegates from at least
seven states had to be present in order for business to be transacted.
All of the delegates
agreed on a number of basic concepts. They wanted the powers of the national government to be divided
among three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. They wanted the central government to
limit the power of the states to print their own money. And they all wanted, in varying degrees, a
more powerful central government. Delegates therefore did not debate these fundamental issues.
Rather, they argued over how to put these principles into practice | |
.
|
|
4.
|
What motivated the delegates to work under such adverse conditions at the
constitutional convention?
a. | the desire to improve the government of the United States | c. | the desire to make
their individual states more powerful | b. | they were not motivated | d. | the desire to make more
money |
|
|
5.
|
The over-all plan for government called for the government to be divided into
_____ branches.
|
|
|
Revolutionary Plans and Compromises James Madison had spent months reviewing
European political theory before he went to the Philadelphia convention. His Virginia delegation
arrived before anyone else, and he put the delegates to work immediately
On the first day of
the convention, governor Edmund Randolph of Virginia was able to present fifteen resolutions, which
became known as the Virginia Plan. This was a masterful political stroke on the part of the Virginia
delegation. It immediately set the agenda-the plan of things to be done-for the remainder of the
convention. | |
|
|
6.
|
How did Virginia set the agenda for the rest of the convention
a. | by introducing their plan first it became the main topic of discussion throughout the
convention | c. | by having more votes than any other state at the convention | b. | by controlling the
chairmanships of most of the committees | d. | by controlling the way the states were organized |
|
|
7.
|
Albert Einstein was to the theory of relativity as James Madison was to
__________
a. | colonial America | c. | the state of Virginia | b. | the
constitution | d. | the
revolutionary war |
|
|
|
The Virginia Plan The fifteen resolutions under the Virginia Plan proposed an
entirely new national government. The plan, which favored large states such as Virginia, called for
the following:
·
Bicameral legislature-that is, a two-house legislature. (House and Senate)
Members
of the lower house were to be chosen by the people. The upper house was to have fewer members, who
were to be chosen by the elected members of the lower house. The number of representatives from each
state would be based on the state's population, so the larger states would have more
representatives. The national legislature could void any state laws.
A national executive
branch, which would be elected by the legislature.
A national court system, created by the
legislature.
The smaller states immediately complained. After all, under the Articles
all states were equal, and the convention had no power to change this arrangement. In the Virginia
plan the states with the most population would have the most members in the House of
Representatives. After two weeks of debate, the smaller states offered their own
plan. | |
CONGRESS LEGISLATIVE | PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE | SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL | House of
Representatives | Senate | President | Supreme
Court | | | | | | |
|
|
8.
|
The Virginia plan favored the
a. | big states with more territory | c. | small states with smaller
populations | b. | smaller states with less territory | d. | big states with more
population |
|
|
9.
|
How many branches of government were there under the Virginia plan?
|
|
10.
|
Why did the small states object to the Virginia Plan?
a. | the small states had less power in congress because they had less
population | c. | all of these reasons | b. | under the Articles of Confederation all states
had equal power | d. | the small
states were afraid of the power of the big states |
|
|
11.
|
Under the Virginia plan, who elected the president?
a. | the states | c. | the congress | b. | courts | d. | the people |
|
|
|
The New Jersey Plan William Paterson of New Jersey presented an alternative plan
favorable to the smaller states. The New Jersey Plan, as it was called, was based more closely on the
Articles of Confederation. He suggested the following:
· That Congress be able to regulate trade
and impose taxes. · That each state have only one
vote. · That acts of Congress be the supreme law of the
land. · That an executive office of more than one person be
elected by Congress.
· That the executive office appoint
a national supreme court.
| |
|
|
12.
|
Under the New Jersey plan, who had the power?
a. | the states, equally | c. | the people | b. | New Jersey | d. | the president |
|
|
|
The Great Compromise The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan differed in
several ways, but the major disagreement involved how states would be represented in the national
legislature. Whereas the Virginia Plan would base representation on state population, the New Jersey
Plan would provide equal representation for all the states. Since the large states had more
population, they would have more power in the legislature (congress).
As the summer grew
hotter, so did the tempers of the delegates. Most were unwilling to consider the New Jersey Plan.
When the Virginia Plan was brought up again, delegates from the smaller states threatened to leave,
and the convention was in danger of dissolving. The convention was deadlocked.
On July 16,
Roger Sherman of Connecticut proposed a plan to resolve the large-state/small-state controversy. His
plan became known as the Connecticut Compromise, or the Great Compromise. Sherman's plan, which
dealt only with the disagreement about how states would be represented in the national legislature,
proposed a two-house legislature with the following parts:
·A lower house, the House of Representatives, in which the number of
representatives from each state would be based on the number of people in the
state. · An upper house, the Senate, which would have two
members from each state elected by the state legislatures.
The Great Compromise broke
the deadlock. Like any good compromise, it gave something to both sides. Representation in the House
would be based on population, as the larger states wanted. But all states would be equally
represented in the Senate, which is what the smaller states wanted. | |
|
|
13.
|
What is the main idea of the passage above?
a. | The delegates were willing to compromise over representation in the
courts. | c. | Even though the delegates did not want to fail, they were more interested in
preserving their own power in the new congress. | b. | Even though the delegates were interested in
their own state interests they were willing to compromise over representation in the
executive. | d. | Even though the
delegates were interested in their own state interests they were willing to compromise over
representation in the congress.. |
|
|
14.
|
In the compromise plan, the large states would have more power in the _____ and
large and small states would have equal power in the _____ .
a. | senate - house of representatives | c. | congress -
executive | b. | house of representatives - senate | d. | congress -
judicial |
|
|
15.
|
Why was representation in the congress such an important issue to the
delegates?
a. | congress makes the laws for the country | c. | congress runs the day to day
operation of the government | b. | congress is in charge of the
states | d. | congress can change
the constitution |
|
|
|
The Slavery Question A second important compromise settled a disagreement over
how to count slaves for the purposes of determining how many representatives each state would have in
the House of Representatives. Although slavery was legal in every state except Massachusetts, most
slaves and slave owners lived in the South. The southern states wanted slaves to be counted equally
in determining representation in Congress. Because they did not have many slaves, the northern states
took the opposite position. They did not want slaves counted for representation purposes. The
Three-Fifths Compromise broke this deadlock. Three-fifths of the slaves were to be counted for
purposes of representation. (The three-fifths compromise was overturned in 1868 by the Fourteenth
Amendment to the Constitution.)
The Three-Fifths Compromise did not satisfy everyone present.
Many delegates wanted slavery banned completely in the United States. The delegates compromised on
this question by agreeing that Congress could limit the number of slaves imported into the country
after 1808, but the issue of slavery itself was never addressed. The South won twenty years of
unrestricted slave trade and a requirement that slaves who escaped be returned to their
owners. | |
|
|
16.
|
If the slaves were counted as part of the population of a state it would give
the _____ more representatives in the new congress.
a. | three-fifths of the north | c. | north | b. | south | d. | three-fifths of the south |
|
|
17.
|
(Read the entire passage above before answering this question) The
north was against slavery so it wanted the slaves counted as full citizens in state
populations.
|
|
|
Other Issues The delegates debated many other issues at the Constitutional
Convention. These issues included the court system, the duration of the president's term of
office, and the way the president should be elected. Commerce (trade) was also an issue. An important
example involves export taxes.
The South's economic health depended in large part on its
exports of agricultural products. (Exports are sales of goods to other countries.) The South feared
that Congress might pass taxes on these exports. Another compromise was reached. The South agreed to
let Congress have the power to regulate interstate commerce-commerce among the states-as well as
commerce with other nations. In exchange, the South was guaranteed that no export taxes would ever be
imposed on their products. Today, the United States is one of the few countries in the world that
does not tax exports. | |
|
|
18.
|
Which statement below is true.
a. | the U.S. government can control trade between the states but cannot tax
exports. | c. | the U.S. government can control trade between foreign countries but not between the
states | b. | the U.S. government cannot control trade in the United States and cannot tax
exports. | d. | the U.S.
government can tax exports but not imports. |
|
|
19.
|
The passage above shows that
a. | the delegates were willing to compromise over a wide range of issues | c. | the delegates were
unwilling to compromise over trade issues | b. | the delegates did not care about trade
issues | d. | what happened at the
constitutional convention has very little effect on the real world we live in
today |
|
|
|
Ethics and Political Compromises
The founders are sometimes taken to task
for not having banned slavery outright. After all, the Declaration of Independence stated that
“All Men are created equal.” Additionally, many of the delegates to the Constitutional
Convention thought that slavery was morally wrong. Why, then did the founders ignore the slavery
issue and leave it for future generations to resolve? The fact is, those delegates who strongly
believed that slavery should be banned had to face reality. Slavery was an economic issue for the
south who needed the slaves to work the plantations. The southern states would never accept the
constitution if it interfered with the practice of slavery. The southerners believed that without
slavery their economies would collapse. So, in order to create a new and stronger government, the
founders compromised on the slavery question. | |
|
|
20.
|
If the anti-slavery people had insisted on banning slavery in the new
constitution, what would have been the likely outcome.
a. | there would have been a civil war to keep the north from succeeding from the
union | c. | the south would have walked out of the convention and there would be no new
government | b. | the states would have gotten used to the idea and there would have been no
problems. | d. | there might have
been a revolt of the slaves against the south |
|
|
21.
|
The main reason the south wanted to keep slavery was
a. | scientific | c. | ethical | b. | tradition | d. | economic |
|